Influence of Government Type on Policy Making

Influence of Government Type on Policy MakingWhen a state has a democratic government, the process of implementing a law is extremely tedious comp atomic number 18d to a monarchy.In a monarchy,the rulers word is law, and that law is enacted precisely when the ruler says it is, sparing a great deal of time and work. However, the trade-offis necessary,especi wholey in complex form _or_ system of government issues,such asforeign insurance,that relateto war.Whenentering employment withaforeign nation,its crucial for the survival of a nation. War is an extremely costly operation, onethat can cause substantialfinancial deadening toanation. A democratic policy-making system,such asinthe USA,specifically prevents a nationfromentering warsfor any defensiveor distastefulpurposethat is not publicly approved, because a mistake in such stopping point will impact the survival of anation. Even though in that location is a loss of efficiency, it ensures the survival of a nation.However, the main reason why extensive checks on policy is necessary,is because we humans suffer from our own psychological bias.In the book The Nudge, the author describeswe humancan be manipulated by savvy architects of choice .Referencingthat we human,andpoliticiansof course,will sometimes makes incorrect decision or irrational decision basedonpsychological manipulation. A check and balance systemextensivelyprevents that from happening in our government.By make single sided and quick decisions closely impossible from our policy making process.Despite the obvious lossofefficiency, this trade-off of speed for balance is essential. The framers of the American constitution knew well the results of absolute ruleand unified the nation they founded very specifically to avoid such tyranny. A somewhat clunky government is the unavoidable price of a multi-faceted government. In turn, public community is encouraged under such a system, as people are made to feel that their efforts can make a differ ence, as opposed to the awareness that a distant and unconcernedmonarchwill simply do as heor shelikes regardless of public opinion and action.Using the unite States as an example, thepresident, head of the executive branch of government and holder of the ostensive title of head of state,has virtually no power to draft new legislation. In fact, his (or her) authority in this motion is entirely limited to effectively asking nicely forCongress (which constitutes the legislative branch) to introduce the desired law. Political allies in the House of Representatives will certainly comply, but their opponents are sure to question and criticize the new law to within an inch of its life, insisting on amendments and modifications if they offer it to move forward at all. Assuming some agreement oftentaking a long time toreachand achieved only after the necessary rounds of political scheming and posturing can be reached, essentially the entire process must be repeated in the Senate, whe re the unique balance ofsenators may bring the bills future into question yet again.We can see that by allowing discussion and exchange betweentheSenate andHouse,the public participation in the political matter increasesas well. As each citizenrecognizesthat we elected our own policy makers,every citizen makes a difference,as opposedto a monarch,who often distanceshimor herself from the public when making public policy,thus discouragingpublic participation.One way to allow the public participation isallowing public to formspecial interest group to fight down their position in the government by lobbyingtoinfluence other people to support the organizations position.These interest groupsoften testify in legislative hearings,donate topolitical candidates(Www.opensecret.org),and donate money to candidate or organization to lobbypoliticians.When special interest effects certain elect(ip) groups, the candidate of the elite group can spread their ideas to thepublicat large,which results inachangeinpublic opinion, thus ensuring their ideas and objective are in agency in the society. Special interest groupareformedby groups of individuals,andthe groups ability to drawn in largenumbersof citizens straightaway impacts the quality of policy,because when implementing a policy, to satisfy its members,the policy drafting procedure must ensure a common understanding of the law, must be readable (not also complex),and it mustachievethe groups social, political,and legal objectives,which are the criteria of a good-quality policy.Reading) ( view tanks are a wide range of institution that provides public policy research, advice,and analysis, while operating independently. They are non-profitandoperateindependentlyfrom political partiesand government. Their main goal is to help government officialsunderstand and make rational decisionson divers(prenominal) issues.They support policy developments byconducting research oncomplex issueswith their expertise and present their ext ensive findings togovernment officials,such as congress and other officials. Think tanksactasan intermediarybetween knowledge and politicians.However, think tanks approach different issues differently. A scientific approach removes extensive testingoftheories about the policy effects. A professional approach requires analysis of theopportunity cost of different alternatives. And lastly a political approach requires support oftheleft or rightfield party.Although the description above summarizes different approachesfor different think tanks, the underlyingsimultaneous approach requires think tanks to understand complex issues and to provide research and advice tofundersorpolitical leadersand together draft a quality policy that can reach different objective.To explain the difference between political vs economicalal specimen we can look at democracy vs communism.To begin with, democracy is entirely a political stumper.Inthe American sense, democracy is no economic present. It i s a system in which the people at large vote upon voluntary candidates who have asked to serve as representatives in a variety of capacities, and once amiable election, to decide policy as they see fit. As this structure theadministration of the country, with no necessary commentary upon economics, it is a political model.By contrast, communism is an economic model, though its nature does tend to favour a political structure. Communism is an extreme flavour of socialism that emphasizes the dignity of the common worker, who is credited with building and maintaining all human societies. As such, communism purports to establish an economy free of financial inequality, in which the workers constituting most of the population are all equal social partners. It is in this manner that communism can be mistaken for a political model, as such tight controls on societal resources all but require a strong centralized government to oversee distribution. But this is a consequence of communisms economic ideal, rather than a prescription. Communism is an economic model.Again, an economic model as rigid as communism tends to demand a powerful government, but ultimately it is a nations political model not its economic model that determines the selection of policies. This is only sensible, as policy should be set by a nations leaders even if, as in the U.S.Aexample above, those leaders are none but the people themselves and not by directly by economic factors.I believe economic model should dictate policy making, becauseeconomic model isa much effective and less costlyway todrive changes in the country.Whenwe look at theexample of increasealcohol appraiseled to decrease in alcohol purchase.We can see that economic policyclearly influences human behaviour. Not only it decreases drunk driving accidents, it increasesproductivenessand health gains. In the past we have seen example of political models in place to ban alcohol(18thamendment), not only it did not decreasebonus t o purchasealcohol, it increase power, corruption within a nationwhichcausemoresocial damage to anation.Economic model has proven itself as the best model to drive changes in a countryand human behaviour.ReferencesKeilman, John. Higher Booze Tax a Lifesaver?Chicago Tribune. Web. 1 Oct. 2014. transcend Donor Profiles.Center for Responsive Politics. 1 Jan. 2013. Web. 1 Oct. 2014. www.opensecrets.org.Thaler, Richard H., and Cass R. Sunstein.Nudge Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth, and Happiness. New Haven, Conn. Yale UP, 2008. Print.